Nearsure vs Revelo: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Nearsure (3.9/5) edges ahead of Revelo (3.8/5) overall. Nearsure is the better choice for U.S. teams adding Latin American GenAI developers. Revelo is the stronger option for hiring Latin American developers through a marketplace. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Nearsure vs Revelo: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Nearsure | Revelo |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2018 | 2014 |
| HQ | Montevideo, Uruguay (U.S.-incorporated) | São Paulo, Brazil |
| Team size | 500–850 (sources vary) | 400,000+ developer network (per company) |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Augmentation-first business model with a growing AI studio | A very large Latin American pool with payroll and compliance included |
| Pricing model | Monthly staff augmentation rates; project development; rates on request | Marketplace placement with monthly billing; rates on request |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Python, OpenAI, AWS | Python, OpenAI, Hugging Face |
| Industries served | Software & SaaS, Healthcare & life sciences, Financial services | Software & SaaS, AI research labs, Financial services |
Nearsure vs Revelo: overview
Nearsure
Nearsure started operations in 2018 under co-founder and CEO Giuliana Corbo and is described by Bloomberg as a Uruguayan IT services company, though it is incorporated in the United States. Bloomberg reported a 2024 plan to grow to about 850 staff. Remote staff augmentation for U.S. clients is its core business, and the service list has widened to generative AI, cloud migration and Salesforce work through a Data & AI studio.
Revelo
Revelo was founded in late 2014 in Brazil (some sources say 2015) and began as a domestic hiring platform called Contratado. It now runs a network of more than 400,000 Latin American developers and handles hiring and payment for U.S. customers. TechCrunch reported that work on foundation models made up 22% of Revelo's revenue in 2024. Revelo is a marketplace, so engineers are matched through its platform rather than employed in a delivery center.
Services and capabilities: Nearsure vs Revelo
| Capability | Nearsure | Revelo |
|---|---|---|
| LLM / GenAI engineers | ✓ | ✓ |
| MLOps & deployment | ✗ | ✗ |
| Computer vision | ✗ | ✗ |
| Data engineering | ✓ | ✗ |
| AI agent development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fractional / part-time experts | ✗ | ✗ |
| Risk-free trial period | ✗ | ✗ |
| Nearshore time-zone overlap | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Nearsure vs Revelo
| Framework / platform | Nearsure | Revelo |
|---|---|---|
| PyTorch | N/A | N/A |
| TensorFlow | N/A | N/A |
| LangChain | N/A | N/A |
| Hugging Face | N/A | ✓ |
| OpenAI | ✓ | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | N/A |
| Databricks | N/A | N/A |
| MLflow | N/A | N/A |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Nearsure vs Revelo
| Criterion | Nearsure | Revelo |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Full-time dedicated engineers, Dedicated team | Full-time dedicated engineers |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Nearsure vs Revelo
| Dimension | Nearsure | Revelo |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Software & SaaS, Healthcare & life sciences, Financial services | Software & SaaS, AI research labs, Financial services |
| Best use cases | Adding a GenAI developer to a U.S. SaaS team, Staffing data engineers for a cloud migration | Hiring LLM data specialists for a model-training effort, Adding a Brazilian developer to a U.S. SaaS team |
| Typical project type | Full-time dedicated engineers | Full-time dedicated engineers |
Nearsure vs Revelo: pros and cons
| Nearsure | |
|---|---|
| + | Staff augmentation is the main business, so processes are built around it |
| + | Latin American engineers on U.S. hours |
| + | Has been profitable since early in its history, per AméricaEconomía |
| - | AI is a newer studio inside a general staffing company |
| - | Headcount reports vary between 525 and 850 |
| - | HQ location differs between sources |
| Revelo | |
|---|---|
| + | Very large pool across Latin America |
| + | Handles hiring, payroll and compliance |
| + | Foundation-model work gives some engineers LLM training experience |
| - | Marketplace matching means quality varies by candidate |
| - | Founding year is reported as both 2014 and 2015 |
| - | Less hands-on management than employer-based firms |
Who should choose Nearsure?
A typical fit: adding a GenAI developer to a U.S. SaaS team.
Augmentation-first business model with a growing AI studio. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Software & SaaS, Healthcare & life sciences, Financial services.
Who should choose Revelo?
A typical fit: hiring LLM data specialists for a model-training effort.
A very large Latin American pool with payroll and compliance included. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Software & SaaS, AI research labs, Financial services.
Decision matrix: Nearsure vs Revelo
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need a dedicated team for a long programme | Nearsure |
| You want the supplier to own delivery as well as staffing | Neither offers managed delivery; you will lead the work |
| You need one expert part-time | Neither lists part-time experts; ask about reduced hours |
| You want to test an engineer before signing for months | Neither publishes a trial; ask for a short first term |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Nearsure (Not published) vs Revelo (Not published) |
| You need overlap with U.S. working hours | Both; Nearsure rates higher overall |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Nearsure |
Use case fit: Nearsure vs Revelo
| Use case | Nearsure fit | Revelo fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adding a GenAI developer to a U.S. SaaS team | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Staffing data engineers for a cloud migration | Strong | Limited | Nearsure |
| Hiring LLM data specialists for a model-training effort | Limited | Strong | Revelo |
| Adding a Brazilian developer to a U.S. SaaS team | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
Verdict: Nearsure vs Revelo
Nearsure (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Staff Augmentation projects. Augmentation-first business model with a growing AI studio.
Revelo (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need adding a Brazilian developer to a U.S. SaaS team. If your situation matches that, Revelo is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Nearsure vs Revelo FAQ
Is Nearsure better than Revelo?
Nearsure (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Nearsure's strongest advantage: staff augmentation is the main business, so processes are built around it. Revelo's strongest advantage: very large pool across Latin America.
How do Nearsure and Revelo differ in pricing?
Nearsure uses monthly staff augmentation rates; project development; rates on request pricing. Revelo uses marketplace placement with monthly billing; rates on request pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Nearsure or Revelo?
Nearsure is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Nearsure and Revelo?
Nearsure's primary differentiator is: augmentation-first business model with a growing AI studio. Revelo's primary differentiator is: a very large Latin American pool with payroll and compliance included. They also differ in team size (500–850 (sources vary) vs 400,000+ developer network (per company)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Software & SaaS, Healthcare & life sciences vs Software & SaaS, AI research labs).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.